Commentary: Intel, H-P and IBM are making bets, but payoff likely years away
By Therese Poletti, MarketWatch
Last update: 12:01 a.m. EDT July 3, 2008
SAN FRANCISCO (MarketWatch) — As companies like Intel Corp., IBM Corp. and Hewlett-Packard Co. have made moves in the solar power space, many have wondered if these high-tech heavyweights could use either their manufacturing or intellectual muscle to push down costs and thereby lower the price of solar power.
Perhaps eventually, but not quite so fast.
Because of the vast use of silicon wafers in the solar industry, it is easy to leap to the conclusion that these tech giants, which all have great expertise working with silicon, will have a big effect on the nearly $20 billion estimated market this year for solar cells and modules. Solar cells, encased in panels on the rooftops of homes and businesses, convert solar energy into electricity.
While the three tech giants have made investments in solar, their recent actions are unlikely to add a big new supply of solar cells to the market anytime soon. Even though the once-tight market for polysilicon, a key ingredient for the cells, is loosening up a bit, subsidies by governments and utilities currently play more of a role in the cost of solar power.
RSS - Posts
Storm Clouds
Jonathan Fahey, 02.26.09, 05:00 PM EST
Forbes Magazine dated March 16, 2009
First Solar, the darling of the photovoltaic industry, confronts new competition and a bum economy.
image
In warehouses around the world there is a gigawatt of solar panels just sitting in the dark. That represents 20% of all the solar panels produced worldwide in 2008. Prices, predictably, are falling fast. The solar industry is in a period of upheaval, battered by the credit crunch, slowing government subsidies and falling natural gas prices. The company with the most to lose is the industry’s darling–First Solar (FSLR) of Phoenix.
“From a technology perspective, solar is not hard to do,” says Gordon Johnson, an analyst at Hapoalim Securities. “Longer term, this is a commodity business.” Adds a hedge fund investor who speaks anonymously, for fear of offending First Solar: “In the end it will be like selling a toaster–superlow margins and no brand loyalty.”
In an industry marked by broken promises, First Solar has been a success story. It delivered growth and big, uninterrupted profits. Over the past four quarters the company earned $277 million on $1 billion in sales. That’s nearly triple the $103 million profit and $356 million in sales recorded in the year before. Though the company’s stock, at a recent $130, is far from its $300 high of last May, it is comfortably above where it went public in late 2006, $24.50.
First Solar’s success is attributed to Michael Ahearn, the company’s reticent chief executive. (The company declined interview requests.) Ahearn was an adviser to the late John T. Walton, helping the Wal-Mart (WMT) scion find and fund the next great company, when he came across an Ohio outfit called Solar Cells. Ahearn reportedly convinced Walton to invest $45 million in 1999. Ahearn got involved in the business and eventually installed himself as chief executive. By 2002 the company was out of money, but Ahearn convinced Walton to invest another $100 million in what would become First Solar.
Ahearn’s Waltonesque strategy was to drive down cost. There are two basic types of solar cells–traditional crystalline silicon cells made out of the same stuff that powers computers, and thin films made from any of a number of chemical formulations. Thin-film cells are much less efficient at turning sunlight into electricity, but they are cheaper to make. For the buyer, there’s a clear tradeoff. The objective is to get the lowest cost per kilowatt-hour generated. Depending on where it’s installed, a panel will produce something like 1.6 kwh of electricity annually for every watt of peak power.
(more…)